History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. The State Bar
1 Cal. 2d 226
Cal.
1934
Check Treatment
THE COURT.

It appearing that the transaction which formed the basis of the charges preferred against petitioner, and which resulted in a recommendation by the Board of Governors of The State Bar that he be suspended from practice of the law for a period of one year, involved a party or parties who participated therein with petitioner, but who were not proceeded against and whose conduct in the matter has not been inquired into, it is hereby ordered that this entire proceeding be remanded to the Board of Governors with directions to reopen the same, and by proper orders to bring before it for investigation any members of *227The State Bar who directly participated in the said transaction, or take such further steps as may seem meet and proper.

Shenk, J., Waste, C. J., and Thompson, J., dissented.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. The State Bar
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 2, 1934
Citation: 1 Cal. 2d 226
Docket Number: S. F. No. 15063
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.