midpage

Gray v. JaegerGray v. Jaeger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 28, 2005
Versions:

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), entered October 16 and November 1, 2002, which denied defendant‘s motions to vacate a marital agreement dated December 20, 1995, that was incorporated but not merged into a judgment of divorce entered December 23, 1997, and to impose a constructive trust on certain Massachusetts properties allegedly owned by plaintiff and for damages, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

In this postdivorce matrimonial action, the pro se defendant failed to explain properly why supposedly newly discovered evidence was not known at the time of prior postdivorce litigation in 2001, or to offer “reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion” (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]). We have considered defendant‘s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Jaeger
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 28, 2005
Citations: 17 A.D.3d 286; 794 N.Y.S.2d 324; 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4498
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In
    Gray v. Jaeger, 17 A.D.3d 286