History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.
160 A.2d 99
D.C.
1960
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the appellees following a trial finding by the court in their favor.

Appellants have failed to file either a statement of proceedings and evi*100dence or a transcript of the trial testimony [our Rule 21(f) ]. It was incumbent on them to furnish us with a sufficient record to enable us to pass on the error of law assigned; absent such a record we have no way of determining whether the court was correct or not. Consequently we have no discretion except to affirm.1

It is so ordered.

. Levene v. Oliver, D.C.Mun.App., 158 A.2d 324; Courembis v. Morfessis, D.C.Mun.App., 142 A.2d 517.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 14, 1960
Citation: 160 A.2d 99
Docket Number: No. 2527
Court Abbreviation: D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.