History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. Gill
214 A.D. 833
N.Y. App. Div.
1925
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The amended complaint set forth a cause of action to set aside a transfer of corporate stock made by a testamentary trustee, on the ground that it was made in fraud of his cestui que trust. In view of the facts asserted in the moving papers, although such facts are disputed in the answering papers, we think that such an issue was presented in reference to such cause of action as to *834justify the issuance of a temporary injunction. The plaintiffs, for a second cause of action, complained that the transfer was void because made in violation of section 70 of the Public Service Commission Law. We are not prepared to hold that the cause of action thus attempted to be stated has legal merit. Whether or not the transfer was absolutely void we shall continue to regard as an open question. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Van Kirk, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Gill
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 15, 1925
Citation: 214 A.D. 833
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.