History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. Fifield
59 N.H. 131
N.H.
1879
Check Treatment

The referee was warranted in finding that the defendant was in a position to receive notice of a suit from a summons left at his home in Franklin. Not only his legal domicile, but his place of abode, within the meaning of the statute, was in this state. Gilman v. Cutts, 23 N.H. 376, 385 — S.C.,27 N.H. 348, 358; Ward v. Cole, 32 N.H. 452; Brown v. Rollins, 44 N.H. 446.

Judgment for the defendant.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 132

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Fifield
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 131
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.