midpage

Gray v. EldredGray v. Eldred

Michigan Supreme Court
Apr 30, 1906
Docket No. 188
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Grant
Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). No such practice is known to the courts of this State. When defendants in a chancery suit have answered, and in their answer have inserted the usual demurrer clause, and replications have been filed, the case must go to a hearing upon the issues joined and a final decree rendered. It is neither proper nor good practice to permit parties to then take advantage of a demurrer and bring the case into this court by piecemeal. The result would be two trials, and possibly two appeals to this court to determine the issues, and great delay. We cannot sanction such a practice, even at the request of the parties litigant.

Without determining the questions raised, the order of the court will be set aside, and the case remanded for hearing upon proofs, should the parties desire to introduce any. No costs will be allowed.

McAlvay, Montgomery, Hooker, and Moore, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Eldred
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 30, 1906
Citations: 107 N.W. 719; 144 Mich. 23; 1906 Mich. LEXIS 991; Docket No. 188
Docket Number: Docket No. 188
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
Log In