History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. Corey
48 Cal. 208
Cal.
1874
Check Treatment
By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

The Court below held that there was not an actual or immediate delivery and continued change of possession of the personal property, sued for in this action, so as to render the sale valid as against the creditors of Donnellan. We think this conclusion is sustained by the finding of facts.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Corey
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1874
Citation: 48 Cal. 208
Docket Number: No. 3,694
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.