History
  • No items yet
midpage
Graves v. . Pritchett
177 S.E. 641
N.C.
1935
Check Treatment

Civil action by administratrix of surviving partner for partnership accounting and for alleged fraudulent misapplication of partnership assets.

There was a motion to dismiss the action for laches, or because barred by the statute of limitations, which was overruled. Exception. *Page 519

A compulsory reference was ordered, to which both sides excepted, and the defendants appeal. The refusal to dismiss the action will not be disturbed on appeal(Griffin v. Bank, 205 N.C. 253, 171 S.E. 71), but there was error in ordering a compulsory reference without first disposing of the pleas in bar. C. S., 573; Garland v. Arrowood, 172 N.C. 591, 90 S.E. 766; Jonesv. Wooten, 137 N.C. 421, 49 S.E. 915; Royster v. Wright, 118 N.C. 152,24 S.E. 746. Error in this respect is confessed by appellee.

Error.

Case Details

Case Name: Graves v. . Pritchett
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 1, 1935
Citation: 177 S.E. 641
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.