History
  • No items yet
midpage
Graves v. Baker
68 Cal. 134
Cal.
1885
Check Treatment
Foote, C.

The plaintiff sued in ejectment. The land involved in the controversy was the same as that upon which this court held a valid homestead had been declared by Miriam Graves, the wife of Grogan Graves, in case of Steiner v. Graves, No. 5276, unreported. The plaintiff offered this declaration of homestead in evidence to support his right of possession to the land in *135controversy; it was excluded by the court below, and is assigned as error here.

The ground of the exclusion was that the words “ the cash value of said homestead is about four thousand dollars gold coin,” in the declaration, did not state clearly and explicitly the "value of the homestead.

But this court, as we have seen in the case of Steiner v. Graves, supra, held those words to be sufficient.

Therefore, the judgment should be reversed and the cause remanded.

Belcher, C. C., and Searls, C., concurred.

The Court. — For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Graves v. Baker
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 30, 1885
Citation: 68 Cal. 134
Docket Number: No. 8360
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.