History
  • No items yet
midpage
Graves v. Baker
68 Cal. 133
Cal.
1885
Check Treatment
Foote, C.

Action to declare a trust under the provisions of a deed made by Grogan Graves to Miriam Graves, his wife. The trust deed was of property on which a homestead had been declared by Miriam, the wife'of Grogan Graves, before the trust deed was executed and delivered. The declaration of homestead was offered in evidence with a view to defeat this trust deed. It was excluded by the court.

This declaration of homestead has been before this court in the case of Steiner v. Graves et al., No. 5276. And, as we understand, it has been declared valid. (See Ham v. Santa Rosa Bank, 62 Cal. 125.) Therefore, it could only be abandoned by “ a declaration or a grant *134thereof executed and acknowledged ” by Grogan Graves and Miriam Graves, his wife. (Sec. 1243, Civ. Code.) The trust deed was executed and acknowledged by Grogan Graves alone, hence as against a valid declaration of homestead it was void. The court below, in refusing to admit in evidence this declaration of homestead, committed error, and its judgment should be reversed.

Searls, C., and Belcher, C. C., concurred.

The Court. — For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Graves v. Baker
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 30, 1885
Citation: 68 Cal. 133
Docket Number: No. 8298
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.