Plaintiff gave evidence tending to indicate the origin of the bill for the materials furnished and used in the houses built upon the lots covered by the mortgages held by the defendant. Plaintiff called as a witness Major Davison, who testified that the plaintiff and his wife and the defendant on one occasion appeared at the office of Davison, and “talked about a claim that Mr. Grauwiller had for furnishing some certain houses. *' * * Mrs. Grauwiller seemed to want to know whether it was necessary that she should file a lien, as I understood it; and Mr. Culver was brought to state to me the condition of the mortgage that he had. * * """ In the conversation they talked about the furnishings and the mortgage, and, as I understand it from their conversation, Mr. Culver had a mortgage that
We think the verdict is supported by the evidence, and that there were no prejudicial exceptions, taken during the trial, requiring us to disturb the verdict. It is therefore advised that the verdict be sustained. ' •
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
