History
  • No items yet
midpage
Grantham v. Rangefire Integrated
1:01-cv-01155
| D.N.M. | Dec 3, 2002
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Case 1:01-cv-01155-BB-WDS Document 53 Filed 12/03/02 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MICHAEL A. GRANTHAM,

Plaintiff, vs. Civ. No. 01-1155 BB/WWD ACE RANGEFIRE INTEGRATED NETWORKS,

INC., MICHAEL C. DITMORE, BRUCE W.

McROY, THOMAS HARRIMAN, NORMAN

SPRAGUE, DENISON BOLLAY, CARL W.

STROBEL, ELWOOD HOWSE, CHARLES

HOUSE, AND JOHN DOES I-X,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Permitting Deferral of Expert Report Submission Until After Termination of Discovery [docket no. 43] filed October 18, 2002. The motion seeks to delay submission of expert witness reports until after discovery is completed so that Plaintiff would have the testimony of other witnesses for use by its expert witness. A similar argument could be made with respect to almost any lawsuit requiring expert witnesses. The rules contemplate a certain sequence in developing a lawsuit, and provision is made for supplementing expert witness reports in the event that evidence developed after the report is made necessitates such supplementation. Accordingly, I find that the instant motion is not well taken and that it should be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED .

________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: Grantham v. Rangefire Integrated
Court Name: District Court, D. New Mexico
Date Published: Dec 3, 2002
Docket Number: 1:01-cv-01155
Court Abbreviation: D.N.M.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.