midpage

Grant v. HeitGrant v. Heit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Aug 28, 1997
Versions:242 A.D.2d 247
662 N.Y.S.2d 29
1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8476

Order, Supreme Court, New York County *248(Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about March 25, 1996, which confirmed, in part, the Special Referee’s report and imposed sanctions of $500 each on defendant and her attorney, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Special Referee’s findings, including those concerning the value of the parties’ respective contributions in satisfying partnership liabilities after dissolution, are substantially supported by the record and should not be disturbed (see, Barr v Barr, 232 AD2d 316). The sanctions imposed on defendant, an attorney, for signing her attorney’s name on two affirmations, and on defendant’s attorney for permitting this violation of CPLR 2106, are appropriate. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur— Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Grant v. Heit
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Aug 28, 1997
Citations: 242 A.D.2d 247; 662 N.Y.S.2d 29; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8476
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In