Peggy Grant, Appellant, v County of Nassau et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department
814 N.Y.S.2d 219
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
The court was without the authority to dismiss this action based solely on the plaintiff’s failure to comply with
The defendants allege that the court marked this action “purged no activity” on December 11, 2000. In her reply brief on appeal, the plaintiff acknowledges that some action was taken by the court on that date, but claims that the case was “simply removed” from the court’s calendar “due to a brief period of inactivity.” The record does not contain any written proof of the court’s alleged action on December 11, 2000. There is no order dismissing this action pursuant to
Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
