57 S.W. 1134
Mo.
1900
BUEGESS, J.

This case in all of its salient features, is a parallel to the case of Bitterer and others against E. M. Crawford, decided at the present term, page 51 this vol-*42time, tbe only difference beipg in tbeir organizations, and the property.

Eor reasons given in that ease the judgment is reversed.

Gantt, P. J., and Sherwood, J., concur.