Granata v. Broderick, 172 A.3d 548

PER CURIAM

The Court granted certification to review petitioners’ challenges to the Superior Court, Appellate Division’s determinations regarding the distribution priorities of the attorney’s fee award, more specifically the rulings that an attorney’s pledge of anticipated attorney’s fees can be considered an account receivable and secured under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), and that the lender here complied with the requirements of the UCC to perfect its security interest by filing a financing statement covering the collateral of the anticipated attorney’s fees. Having considered the parties’ arguments presented in their briefs and at oral argument, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in those parts of Judge Guadagno’s opinion addressing the distribution priorities of the attorney’s fee award, reported at 446 N.J. Super. 449, 143 A.3d 309 (App. Div. 2016).

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ-VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Granata v. Broderick

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Nov 14, 2017

Citations: 172 A.3d 548; 231 N.J. 135; 078207

Docket Number: 078207

Court Abbreviation: N.J.