28 S.E.2d 884 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1944
1. One of the indispensable requisites of a valid motion for a new trial is that it be accompanied by a brief of the evidence, and if there is no brief of the evidence, no motion for a new trial exists.
2. The brief required is a brief of the evidence adduced upon the trial, upon which the verdict and judgment complained of are predicated, and not merely a brief of the evidence introduced upon a motion of one of the parties for a continuance.
3. Under the law and the facts, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
1. It has been held many times by this court and the Supreme Court that one of the indispensable requisites of a valid motion for a new trial is that it be accompanied by a brief of the evidence. "If there is no brief of the evidence, no motion for a new trial exists." *598 Whitaker v. State,
2. An unapproved brief of the evidence adduced on the motion to continue the case appears in the back of the record brought to this court; but even if this had been approved, it would not have been a sufficient compliance with the law that requires the filing of an approved brief of the evidence with a motion for a new trial. "The brief required is a brief of the evidence adduced upon the trial, upon which is predicated the verdict complained of, and not merely a brief of the evidence introduced upon a motion of one of the parties for a continuance." Butler v.Jaques Tinsley Co.,
3. As above stated, there was no assignment of error on the verdict and judgment, or on the judgment overruling the motion for new trial. Nor was it alleged or contended that the verdict would have been different had the defendant been present in court at the trial.
Under the facts and the law applicable thereto, the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed. Felton and Parker, JJ., concur.