Order reversed, with *947costs, and verdict reinstated, with costs. Held, the verdict seems to have been set aside upon the ground that the court erred in excluding the unsworn statement of the infant plaintiff. We think that evidence was properly excluded. (See Gavrilutz v. Savage, 166 App. Div. 309; Stoppiek v. Goldstein, 174 id. 306.) All concurred.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
