History
  • No items yet
midpage
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Datta
1:22-cv-10531
| S.D.N.Y. | Jul 16, 2025
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ x :

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE : COMPANY, et al., : cv ‐ (OTW) : Plaintiffs,

: OPINION & ORDER ON : RECONSIDERATION ‐  : SUKDEB DATTA, M.D. et al., : : :

:

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ x

ONA WANG, Judge: The Court receipt 195. For following reasons, parties’ . This was assigned me purposes on October 2024. (ECF 104). March were leave amend their complaint add Arthur Kostanian, Sergey Denevich, Skazka LLC as Defendants (the “Skazka Defendants”). (ECF In Amended Rule 26(f) Report, stated they explicitly did not consent magistrate judge jurisdiction. (ECF issued vacated, returned District Judge. The timely responded, on Defendants’ response confirmed, again, magistrate judge on issued recommending she: vacate *2 the of this case to me; set a trial date; and (3) refer the case to for general pretrial management consistent with the trial date set.

On June 2025, voluntarily dismissed all claims in this action against the ( See ECF June I the remaining parties—who had previously consented my jurisdiction for all purposes—to file any motion for reconsideration of my 6 Report and Recommendation by July the remaining parties filed a joint motion for reconsideration, in which note that, now that the claims the have been dismissed, parties the case have consented my

“A motion reconsideration should be only if the movant identifies intervening change of controlling law, availability of new evidence, or need correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Tr. , 729 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2013) (citing Spin Master Ltd. v. 158 , 18 CV 1774 (LJL), 2020 WL at *1 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Since parties have indeed provided new evidence that militates favor of reconsideration of my Report and Recommendation—namely, parties who my jurisdiction are now no longer parties this case. ( See joint my , my recommendation be reassigned Judge Rearden vacated. Moreover, find have shown cause this reassigned deem Court’s satisfied. *3 Clerk respectfully close

SO ORDERED. s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: Ona Wang New York, New York

Case Details

Case Name: Government Employees Insurance Company v. Datta
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Jul 16, 2025
Docket Number: 1:22-cv-10531
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.