midpage

Gould v. KerwickGould v. Kerwick

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 11, 1982
Versions:57 N.Y.2d 1012
443 N.E.2d 948
457 N.Y.S.2d 474
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3853

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), *1016order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 917, 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Case Details

Case Name: Gould v. Kerwick
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 11, 1982
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 1012; 443 N.E.2d 948; 457 N.Y.S.2d 474; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3853
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In