History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gould v. Gould
642 N.Y.S.2d 823
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In a custody case, we accord respect to "the Trial Judge’s advantage * * * in being able to observe the demeanor of the witnesses” (Matter of Louise E. S. v W. Stephen S., 64 NY2d 946, 947). Family Court evaluated the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties and we will not substitute our "own evaluation of [those] subjective factors for that of the nisi prius court” (Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 173). The court did not abuse its discretion in ordering joint custody with primary physical custody with the father. (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Gould v. Gould
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 19, 1996
Citation: 642 N.Y.S.2d 823
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.