History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gouge v. Hart
40 S. Ct. 179
SCOTUS
1920
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of

jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. *543Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: Gouge v. Hart
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 19, 1920
Citation: 40 S. Ct. 179
Docket Number: No. 136
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.