Gotbetter v. Dow Jones & Co.Gotbetter v. Dow Jones & Co.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered September 17, 1997, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action in defamation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Defendants wrote and published an article about a Federal lawsuit commenced by plaintiff against Victoria’s Secret, detailing the circumstances of that action and several similar frivolous lawsuits commenced by plaintiff, who then commenced the instant action against these defendants alleging libel per se. The court correctly granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint on the ground that there is nothing in the complained of article that defames plaintiff in his trade, business or profession as alleged in the complaint (see, Aronson v Wiersma,
The report in the article that Victoria’s Secret’s counsel called plaintiff’s suit “baseless” is not actionable because the cited statement is merely an opinion (Immuno AG. v Moor-Jankowski,
Plaintiff argues that defendants’ reporting was not fair and balanced, but this Court has observed that “[w]hether or not a particular article constitutes unbalanced reporting is essentially a matter involving editorial judgment and is not actionable” (Sprecher v Dow Jones & Co.,