Goswick v. Mittelman, 177 So. 2d 253

Goswick v. Mittelman

177 So. 2d 253

Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

1965

Check Treatment

PER CURIAM.

The appellant urges the insufficiency of the proof upon the entry of a summary final *254decree of foreclosure. An examination of the record reveals that the appellant, as defendant, filed no answer other than a general denial and offered no affidavit or other type of proof at the hearing on the motion. The plaintiff, appellee, offered sworn testimony sufficient to establish a prima facie case. Under these circumstances, the chancellor properly entered the summary decree appealed. See Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715; Kelly v. Patek, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 520.

Affirmed.