202 N.C. 234
N.C.
1932
ConNOk, J.

It is well settled in this and other jurisdictions that where an employer, in recognition of his legal or moral obligations to his employee, employs a physician or surgeon to render professional services to his employee, who is in need of such services, whether as the result of the negligence of the employer or otherwise,, the only duty which the employer owes to such employee, is to exercise reasonable care in the selection and employment of the physician or surgeon. Where the employer has exercised such care, and has employed a physician or surgeon who is duly licensed to practice his profession in this State, who is actively engaged in such practice, and who is not known to the employer as wanting in professional skill or character, the employer will not be held liable for damages resulting from the unskillful or negligent treatment of his employee by the physician or surgeon employed by him. Barden v. R. R., 152 N. C., 318, 67 S. E., 971. The general rule is that an action for damages caused by the negligence or unskillfulness of a physician or surgeon engaged by one person to attend upon another, professionally, cannot be maintained against the employer, unless he was himself chargeable with a want of proper care in the selection and employment of the physician or surgeon. 19 A. L. R., p. 1183. In the absence of an allegation in the complaint in the instant case that the defendant, Southern Railway Company, failed to exercise reasonable care in the selection and employment of Dr. Hilliard to treat the plaintiff, professionally, after he was injured by the negligence of said defendant, the facts stated in the complaint are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, Southern Railway Company. *237 For this reason, there is no error in the judgment dismissing the action as to said defendant.

In Penland v. Hospital, 199 N. C., 314, 154 S. E., 466, it is said: “The owner of a hospital, whether an individual, firm or corporation, is not liable for damages resulting from a surgical operation, or from treatment, medical or otherwise, in said hospital, when the surgeon who performed the operation or the physician who treated the patient, was employed by the patient, or by some one other than such owner, and the damages resulted from the negligence of such surgeon or physician. The owner of the hospital, when the hospital is conducted for his, their, or its gain, and not for charitable purposes, is liable for such damages when they result from injuries caused by the negligence of such owner, or by the negligence of his, their or its agents, servants or employees acting within the scope of their employment. "When the owner of the hospital undertakes only to furnish the facilities for the operation, or for the treatment of the patient, and the patient selects and employs the surgeon who operates on or the physician who treats the patient, such owner, although he, they or it charges for the use of the facilities furnished, is not liable for damages resulting solely from the negligence of the surgeon or physician.” In the complaint in the instant case, it is not alleged that Dr. Hilliard was an employee of the defendant, Biltmore Hospital, Incorporated, or treated the plaintiff as the agent of said defendant. In the absence of such allegations, the facts stated in the complaint are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant, Biltmore Hospital, Incorporated. Eor this reason there is no error in the judgment dismissing the action as against the said defendant.

The cause of action alleged in the complaint in this action against Dr. William D. Hilliard, upon which plaintiff demands judgment against the defendant, Halcyone Parker Hilliard, his executrix, did not arise out of the negligence of the defendant, Southern Railway Company. It arose out of and is founded upon the unskillful and negligent treatment of plaintiff’s broken leg by Dr. Hilliard. The judgment recovered by the plaintiff against the Southern Railway Company in the action tried in the Superior Court of Buncombe County and fully satisfied by said company before the commencement of this action, is not a bar to plaintiff’s recovery in this action against the defendant, Halcyone Parker Hilliard, executrix of Dr. William D. Hilliard. The cause of action on which said judgment was recovered is separate and distinct from the cause of action alleged in the complaint in this action. Eor this reason plaintiff is not barred from recovery against said defendant *238 in this action 'by said judgment. There is error in the judgment dismissing the action as to the defendant, Haley one Parker Hilliard, executrix.

The judgment dismissing the action as to the defendants, Southern Railway Company and Biltmore Hospital, Incorporated, is

Affirmed.

As to the defendant, Halcyone Parker Hilliard, executrix, it is Reversed.