68 P. 147 | Utah | 1902
This is an action in equity, and was brought to set aside and cancel a deed to certain real property executed by the plaintiff to the defendant, and to have the plaintiff adjudged to be the real owner of the premises. The case is before us for the second time. On the former occasion the appeal was from a judgment of nonsuit granted at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony. We then granted a reversal and remanded the caus$, for further proceedings. See 23 Utah 120, 63 Pac. 902. Thereafter the court below proceeded with the case pursuant to the mandate of this court, and, after the defendant introduced his evidence and both sides rested, entered a decree in favor of the defendant, holding -that the plaintiff was entitled to no relief, and dismissing the action. Thereupon this appeal was prosecuted.
The respondent insists that his motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the record should be sustained, because, as he claims, the same was not prepared as provided by
The appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment and decree. In the opinion rendered on the former appeal in this case the substance of the evidence of the plaintiff was carefully stated, and at considerable
We do not regard it necessary to discuss any of the other questions presented, although they have not escaped our notice. There appears to be no reversible error in the record.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.