49 Ga. App. 567 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1934
1. Upon the trial of a suit by the superintendent of banks to recover of the defendant the amount of an assessment upon him as a stockholder of an insolvent bank, where the defendant’s liability is dependent upon the alleged invalidity of a transfer of stock made by him more than a year prior to the taking over of the bank for liquidation by the superintendent of banks, where it is alleged that the transfer, which was made to one “W. G. Jackson,” was a nullity and was void, and constituted no transfer of the stock, in that the transferee was a fictitious person and that the alleged transfer was made for the purpose of evading liability for an assessment upon the defendant as a stockholder in the event of a failure of the bank, where there was evidence that when the stock was transferred to W. G. Jackson the new certificates of stock which were issued by the bank were receipted for by a person who purported to be the attorney for W. G. Jackson, that at a meeting of the stockholders afterwards the same attorney appeared as representing W. G. Jackson by proxy, that the signature of W. G. Jackson to the transfer of the certificates made later was, at the request of this same attorney, attested by the assistant cashier of the bank, who, however, did not see W. G. Jackson sign the transfer, but attested the signature on the representation of this attorney that it was the signature of “W. G. Jackson,” that the officers of the bank who participated in the above transactions never knew “W. G. Jackson,” and, so far as they knew, had never seen him and had never heard of him, that the stock certificates as issued to W. G. Jackson purported to be issued to him as residing at Athens, Georgia, that county officers of the county in which the bank was located, which was Oglethorpe county, and of' the county in which W. G. Jackson purported to live, which was Clarke county, and who had lived in their respective counties and held their respective offices for many years, and who inferentially were aeqrrainted with practically everybody having an established residence in their respective counties, did not know W. G. Jackson and had never heard of him, although there
2. The evidence otherwise supported the allegations in the petition and the court erred in granting- a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.