Gordzica v. New York City Transit AuthorityGordzica v. New York City Transit Authority
The court erred in admitting the alleged statement made by defendant‘s ticket booth clerk to plaintiff that she had reported the defective condition six times prior to plaintiff‘s trip and fall. The evidence does not show that the statement was made within the clerk‘s authority as a speaking agent on behalf of defendant (see Tyrrell v Wal-Mart Stores, 97 NY2d 650 [2001]; Loschiavo v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 58 NY2d 1040 [1983]). The error in admitting the statement was not harmless under the circumstances presented. Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.