1 So. 2d 234 | Miss. | 1941
Appellant is the holder of a number of unpaid teachers' certificates, and of some issued for the transportation *207 of pupils. It is admitted in the agreed statement of facts that neither the teachers nor the carriers were such under written contracts, as stipulated in the pertinent statutes.
We have already held in Fitch v. Upshaw,
Appellant contends, however, that he is entitled to some sort of relief under Chapter 255, Laws 1936, but that chapter is for the benefit of those who hold valid obligations of school districts, and is not a curative statute in the sense in which appellant seeks to make it applicable here.
Affirmed.