History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gorday v. Cravey
142 Ga. 114
Ga.
1914
Check Treatment
Beck, J.

1. While certain portions of the evidence admitted over the objection of the propounder were of slight materiality, yet as they were not entirely immaterial or irrelevant, the court did not err in admitting the same.

2. The court in his charge fully and fairly submitted the issues raised by ■ the caveat, and the portions of' the charge excepted to were not error for the reasons assigned.

3. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict; and the same having received the approval of the trial judge, it will not be disturbed here.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Evans, P. J., and Atkinson, J., dissenting as to the third headnote.

Case Details

Case Name: Gorday v. Cravey
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 16, 1914
Citation: 142 Ga. 114
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.