Goolsby v. State
24 Ga. App. 330 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1919
1. The evidence in this case authorized the conviction of the offense of robbery.
2. The charge of the court is not subject to the criticism that it failed to instruct the jury upon the question of intent to steal being a necessary ingredient of the crime of robbery. The jury was instructed that robbery was charged to have been committed by the defendant, and the elements of robbery were fully charged.
3. The court fully charged upon the subject of alibi as- a defense. The verdict being authorized, and there being no error assigned which entitles the defendant to a new trial, it was proper for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.