History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goodwin v. State
118 Ga. 770
Ga.
1903
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

1. It was not error to refuse to quash the indictment for any of the reasons set forth in the general or special demurrers filed by the accused.

2. In the trial of an indictment for perjury it was error, in instructing the jury as to the essential ingredients of the offense, to entirely omit that of knowledge of the falsity of the testimony given, and to charge that the jury should find the accused guilty if they believed that he had, on the occasion set out in the indictment, sworn to the statements set out, and that such statements were material and false. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. T. Hides Fort and Hatcher & Carson, for plaintiff in error,

cited, as to the indictment: 2 Bish. Crim. Proc. (3d ed.), §§914, 916-17-18-19, 924 et. seq.; Ga. Rep. 52/242; 76/790; 90/441; 99/706; 103/263; 109/52; 116/559-62.

S. P. Gilbert, solicitor-general, contra,

cited Penal Code, §§ 256, 929; Ga. Rep. 103/263, 265-6; 76/790.

Case Details

Case Name: Goodwin v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 29, 1903
Citation: 118 Ga. 770
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.