History
  • No items yet
midpage
737 So. 2d 1077
Fla.
1999
PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc., 712 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), based upon conflict jurisdiction. After further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. We also decline to address the remaining points raised on appeal as they are beyond the scope of the alleged conflict and do not form an independent basis of jurisdiction before this Court. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Goodman v. Temple Shir Ami, Inc.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 8, 1999
Citations: 737 So. 2d 1077; 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 382; 1999 WL 459752; 1999 Fla. LEXIS 1182; No. 93,832
Docket Number: No. 93,832
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In