180 S.E. 661 | N.C. | 1935
Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants.
On 15 January, 1933, the plaintiff purchased a ticket in Charlotte, N.C. and became a passenger on a bus of the Queen City Lines, Inc., for Atlanta, Ga. When the bus reached the Union Station in Greenville, S.C., the driver made the general announcement that the bus would stop at said terminal for thirty minutes for lunch and rest. Whereupon the plaintiff left the bus, went into the station, through the ladies' rest room, into the toilet, and, on returning from the toilet to the rest room, she stepped down a slight depression of about six inches on to the wet floor — unnoticed at the time because of the dimness of the light — which caused her to slip and fall, causing serious injuries.
The defendants' evidence is in sharp conflict with that of the plaintiff's, both as to the sufficiency of the light and also as to the slippery condition of the floor.
It is in evidence that under a regulation of the South Carolina Railroad Commission only one bus station is permitted in the city of Greenville, and all bus lines carrying passengers in and out of said city are required by said regulation to discharge and take on passengers at this central station.
The defendant Queen City Lines, Inc., used the Union Bus Station of Greenville for taking on and discharging passengers, and, on the particular occasion had a stop-over at this station of thirty minutes.
The defendants Camel City Coach Company, Skyland Stages, Inc., and Queen City Coach Company were lessees of the bus station in question, according to the lease introduced in evidence by the plaintiff.
The defendants Atlantic Greyhound Lines of North Carolina, Inc., Eagle Bus Lines, Inc., and W. M. Shelton, trading as The Red Top Bus Lines, were neither lessees of the station, under the evidence, nor carriers of the plaintiff as a passenger. *325
Charles F. Nimmo testified that he was agent and manager of the Union Bus Station in Greenville on 15 January, 1933, and sold tickets over all the bus lines that stopped or passed there.
The defendants seasonably demurred to the evidence and moved for judgments as of nonsuit under the Hinsdale Act, C. S., 567. Overruled; exceptions.
The usual issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury and answered in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment on the verdict, from which the defendants appeal, assigning errors. It is not perceived upon what theory the defendants Atlantic Greyhound Lines of North Carolina, Inc., Eagle Bus Lines, Inc., and W. M. Shelton, trading as The Red Top Bus Lines, can be held liable for plaintiff's injuries. These lines were not lessees of the station in which she was injured, nor was the plaintiff a passenger on any of them, either actual or prospective. She did not intend to become such. The demurrer to the evidence, interposed by these defendants, should have been sustained.
The defendants Camel City Coach Company, Skyland Stages, Inc., and Queen City Coach Company were lessees of the building in which plaintiff was injured. As to them, the plaintiff was a permissive licensee. Quantz v. R.R.,
The case of Peters v. Detroit, etc., R. Co.,
There is no evidence of any wilful or wanton negligence on the part of the lessees of the premises. Hence, the demurrer to the evidence, interposed by these defendants, should have been sustained. Monroe v. R.R.,
With respect to the Queen City Lines, Inc., the plaintiff did not lose her status as a passenger by temporarily alighting at an intermediate station, for the purpose stated, with the express or implied consent of the carrier. 10 C. J., 628. It has been held that the duty to furnish reasonably safe platforms and the like does not apply to a passenger who leaves a train at an intermediate station. 10 C. J., 923. It is otherwise, however, where the passenger, as in the instant case, does so at the express or implied invitation of the carrier. Mangum v. R. R.,
The demurrer to the evidence was properly overruled as to the Queen City Lines, Inc. Dean v. Yelloway Pioneer System,
It follows, therefore, that the judgment must be affirmed as to the Queen City Lines, Inc., and reversed as to the other defendants.
On appeal, Queen City Lines, Inc.,
No error.
On appeal, other defendants,
Reversed.