251 N.W. 593 | Mich. | 1933
This is a mandamus proceeding in which plaintiff seeks to have defendants directed to make payment of certain matured drain bonds and of matured interest coupons. The relief sought was granted by the trial judge and defendants have appealed. The bonds here involved were in part issued incident to the construction of the Beyer drain (see Hankinson v. Deake, ante, 1) and part were issued incident to the construction of the West Park Miller avenue drain. Except as hereinafter noted the questions presented are controlled by our recent decision inRegents of the University of *357 Michigan v. Pray,
"Mandamus is a proper remedy to compel payment of a claim against a municipal or public corporation where there are funds generally applicable to its payment. So mandamus lies to compel payment of a claim against a special fund which is in existence and in the hands of the proper officer." 38 C. J. p. 768.
See, also, Ullman v. Sandell,
The fact that the injunction suit, to which plaintiff was not a party, was pending, did not impair plaintiff's right to have payment nor relieve defendants of the obligation to make payment.
Judgment is affirmed, with costs to appellee.
McDONALD, C.J., and POTTER, SITARPE, FEAD, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. CLARK, J., took no part in this decision. *358