Gonzalez v. PrackGonzalez v. Prack
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in two separate misbehavior reports with violating various prison disciplinary rules. Following a combined tier III hearing, he was found guilty of assaulting staff (two counts), committing an unhygienic act, disobeying a direct order and refusing a search. On administrative appeal, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. This
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior reports and related documentation, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, including the confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer in camera (see Matter of Sweet v Poole, 48 AD3d 867, 867 [2008]). Regarding petitioner‘s assertion that the record contains conflicting evidence, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of McNulty v Fischer, 49 AD3d 946, 946-947 [2008]). We have examined petitioner‘s remaining contentions, including his claims that the hearing was untimely, he was denied the right
Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Kavanagh, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.