*1 THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH Thomas C. Seabaugh, Esq., SBN 272458 | tseabaugh@seabaughfirm.com 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue Pasadena, California 91103 Telephone: (818) 928-5290 CHAIN COHN STILES David K Cohn, Esq., SBN 68768 | dcohn@chainlaw.com Neil K. Gehlawat, Esq., SBN 289388 | ngehlawat@chainlaw.com 1430 Truxtun Ave., Suite 100 Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 323-4000 Facsimile: (661) 324-1352 Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARTURO GONZALES, Case No. 1:16-CV-00107-JLT
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS vs.
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, GARY CARRUESCO, DOUG BARRIER, KASEY KNOTT, JUAN OROZCO, and DOES 5-10, (Doc. 41)
Defendants.
-1-
PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
PROPOSED ORDER
Before the Court is a stipulation among the parties with which they propose to resolve certain issues arising with respect to their contemplated dispositive motions by means of a compromise. Good cause appearing, the Court adopts the parties stipulation and orders that:
1. The following claims for relief in the Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs as to those claims: (1) Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief (substantive due process under federal law); (2) Plaintiff’s Tenth Claim for Relief (under the California Bane Act) as to Defendant Carruesco only
2. Defendants’ motion for summary adjudication will be limited to (1) the false arrest claims raised in the First Claim for Relief (wrongful detention or arrest under federal law) and the Seventh Claim for Relief (false arrest under state law); and (2) the claims against Defendant Carruesco.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 24, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-2-
PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS