History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldstein v. Wright
264 A.D. 836
N.Y. App. Div.
1942
Check Treatment

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, without costs, and items 2 and 3 of the demand for a biE of particulars aEowed as modified herein: 2. An itemized statement of the services rendered by plaintiff to the copartnership of Wright & Sexton as aEeged in paragraph “ seventh ” of the complaint. 3. An itemized statement of services rendered by plaintiff to said George S. Simpson individually^ in contradistinction *837to services rendered to the copartnership. Verified bill of particulars to be served within fifteen days after service of order. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Goldstein v. Wright
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 5, 1942
Citation: 264 A.D. 836
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.