History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldsmith v. Commissioner
1927 BTA LEXIS 3239
B.T.A.
1927
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Littleton:

The Commissioner determined a deficiency of $31.20 for the calendar year 1924. Petitioner claims that the Commissioner erred in disallowing a deduction of $1,040 personally paid by her to one Louis Kottler to look after her interests in a corporation in which she owned a one-half interest, during her temporary residence in a State other than the State in which the business of the corporation was carried on.

FINDINGS OF FACT.

Petitioner is now a resident of Chicago, Ill. During the year 1924 she ivas a resident of St. Louis, Mo. During that year she was vice president and owned 50 per cent, or $30,000 par value, of the capital stock of William Shultan Co. engaged in business at Chicago, Ill. She received a fixed salary of $5,000 a year. Due to her absence from Chicago and her inability to protect her interest in the corporation and the determination on her part that it was necessary to have some one there to look after her interests and keep her fully advised, she personally employed Louis Kottler and paid him a salary of $20 a week or a total of $1,040 in the year 1924 to look after her interests in the corporation and to keep her fully advised in the Xiremises. She claimed the $1,040 as a deduction from her gross income as an ordinary and necessary business expense for the year 1924 and the Commissioner disallowed the same.

Judgment will he entered for the petitioner upon the issue raised on 15 days' notice, u/nder Rule 50.

Case Details

Case Name: Goldsmith v. Commissioner
Court Name: United States Board of Tax Appeals
Date Published: May 28, 1927
Citation: 1927 BTA LEXIS 3239
Docket Number: Docket No. 6335.
Court Abbreviation: B.T.A.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.