History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldsboro Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Duke
116 N.C. 202
N.C.
1895
Check Treatment

This case is governed by Patrick v. R. R., 93 N.C. 422. The notice is not an offer which the lessee could accept and thereby make irrevocable. It was a notice of proposed action under the contract which by its terms the lessee could avoid by payment in 30 days of the rent due. The recall of the notice is not an attempted renewal of an ended contract by the withdrawal of a notice in pursuance of which it might soon have ended. Patrick v. R.R., supra, p. 428. *Page 123

It is not necessary to repeat the strong reasoning of Smith, C. J., in that case. The notice could have been withdrawn at any time before the day named for it to take effect. It was vox emissa sed non irrevocabilis.

Error.

(205)

Case Details

Case Name: Goldsboro Storage & Warehouse Co. v. Duke
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1895
Citation: 116 N.C. 202
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.