History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldman v. Illinois
273 U.S. 637
SCOTUS
1926
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Writ of error dismissed for want of *638jurisdiction on the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195. Application for certiorari is also denied. Mr. Montgoméry S. Winning in behalf of Messrs.

Oscar E. Carlstrom and Edward C. Fitch for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Messrs. David D. Stansbury and Leslie A. Gilmore for plaintiff, in error, in opposition thereto.

Case Details

Case Name: Goldman v. Illinois
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 11, 1926
Citation: 273 U.S. 637
Docket Number: No. 248
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.