History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.
190 N.Y.S.2d 158
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

In' an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order denying, with leave to renew, appellant’s motion to examine respondent by its president before trial. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Belfi v. International Commercial Corp., 277 App. Div. 787; Kalmanash v. Weinstein, 271 App. Div. 788; Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) We have, however, examined the merits, and would affirm the order sought to be appealed from if we had not dismissed the appeal. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 8, 1959
Citation: 190 N.Y.S.2d 158
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.