History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldberger v. Gellert
260 A.D. 998
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment

Per Curiam.

According full weight to all the testimony adduced before the official referee and taking into consideration all the elements which may be fairly considered as affecting the market value of the property here involved (Heiman v. Bishop, 272 N. Y. 83), we think that the fair market value as of the date of sale was $11,000 and no.t $9,000 as fixed by the Special Term. The deficiency judgment entered herein should be reduced accordingly.

The order and the judgment should be modified as indicated, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the defendants-appellants.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order and judgment unanimously modified as indicated in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the defendants-appellants. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Goldberger v. Gellert
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 13, 1940
Citation: 260 A.D. 998
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.