History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goldberg v. Parker
221 A.D.2d 267
N.Y. App. Div.
1995
Check Treatment

—Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), *268entered July 12, 1995 which, inter alia, denied the petition for a permanent stay of arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In the absence of an agreement between the broker and the customer wherein the parties designate New York law to govern the agreement and its enforcement, the matter of timeliness of claims under section 15 of the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) Code of Arbitration Procedure is for the arbitrator to determine, not the court (see, Matter of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v Luckie, 85 NY2d 193, 202). Here, there was no agreement between the parties; arbitration is sought solely because the broker/dealer is bound by the terms of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure as a registered broker/dealer. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Goldberg v. Parker
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 28, 1995
Citation: 221 A.D.2d 267
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.