47 S.C. 126 | S.C. | 1896
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action for partition of the land described in the- complaint. The plaintiff alleges that he and the defendant each are seized and possessed in fee of one-half of said lands by reason of a deed of conveyance executed in March, 1878, and recorded in April, 1878.
The exceptions raise substantially but two questions, to wit: 1st. Was there a resulting trust? 2d. Even if there was a resulting trust, could the defendant interpose such defense when more than six years had elapsed, after discovery of the fraud?
It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.