History
  • No items yet
midpage
Godwin v. Hudson
93 Ga. App. 858
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1956
|
Check Treatment
93 Ga. App. 858 (1956)
93 S.E.2d 379

GODWIN
v.
HUDSON.

36187.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 11, 1956.

Joe Salem, for plaintiff in error.

G. Ernest Tidwell, Claude R. Ross, contra.

CARLISLE, J.

1. "Where, in ruling upon demurrers, the trial court allows time for the filing of an amendment, such court shall render a judgment on the sufficiency of the pleadings after the expiration of the time allowed for amendment which shall supersede the earlier judgment on the demurrers, and such earlier judgment or judgments shall not be subject to exception or review." Weinstein v. Rothberg, 87 Ga. App. 94 (1) (73 S.E.2d 106); Sellars v. City of Summerville, 88 Ga. App. 109 (76 S.E.2d 99); Aiken v. State Farm Mutual &c. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S.E.2d 141). And, where the sole assignment of error contained in a *859 bill of exceptions in this court is upon a judgment upon demurrers in which time was allowed for amendment, the writ of error must be

Dismissed. Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Godwin v. Hudson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 11, 1956
Citation: 93 Ga. App. 858
Docket Number: 36187
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.