25 Ga. App. 74 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1920
1. Where the relation of landlord and cropper exists, the title to the crop raised upon the premises is in the landlord, and under the law the cropper cannot without the consent of the landlord sell or-
3. Nor did the court err in striking subsections a, d, f, and g of paragraph 5 of the defendant’s answer, as these sections were subject to the demurrer interposed.
4. The excerpts from the charge of the court complained of in the 2d and 3d grounds of the, amendment to the motion for a new trial do not contain reversible error.
5. The court did not err in refusing to give the requested charge set out in the 4th ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
6. There was evidence to support the verdict; but the judgment entered by the plaintiff’s attorney was not in accordance with the verdict, as it included “ legal interest accrued,” in addition to the sum found by the jury. It is therefore ordered that the judgment he affirmed, with direction that it be amended by writing off the “ legal interest accrued.”
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
cited: Civil Code 3705, 3707, 5514, 5683; 10 Ga. App. 679; 12 Ga. App. 399 (4); 13 Ga. App. 25; 15 Ga. App. 355 (2); 143 Ga. 464; 145 Ga. 588-9; 128 Ga. 447 (5); Civil Code (1910), §§ 3467-3470; 9 Ga. App. 265; 135 Ga. 387; 94 S. C. 216 (77 S. E. 933).
cited: Penal Code (1910), § 729; 92 Ga. 436; 114 Ga. 921.