Godfrey v. State, 506 So. 2d 1158

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the trial court requiring restitution since it is apparent from the record that restitution was not contemplated by the plea agreement. See G.H. v. State, 414 So.2d 1135, 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also Pollock v. Bryson, 450 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (where plea agreement contemplated the restitution ordered, defendant is estopped from raising alleged illegality of the condition); Dent v. State, 432 So.2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (same).

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Godfrey v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: May 12, 1987

Citations: 506 So. 2d 1158; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1231; 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8212; No. 85-1849

Docket Number: No. 85-1849

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.