History
  • No items yet
midpage
Godding v. Brackett
34 Me. 27
Me.
1852
Check Treatment
Howard, J.,

orally. — The bill of sale was not essential to the transfer of the property, and it may be controlled by testimony. The instruction permitted the jury to find, and they must have found, that Hancock paid his own money, and purchased the property for himself. By such finding, it results that the plaintiff was not the purchaser in good faith, and that Hancock, though not the nominal, was the real purchaser.

Judgment on the verdict.

Case Details

Case Name: Godding v. Brackett
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1852
Citation: 34 Me. 27
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.