History
  • No items yet
midpage
Goddard v. Hill
33 Me. 582
Me.
1851
Check Treatment

Held by the Court, that such testimony could not be admitted, as it would be at variance with the written contract.

The defendant then contended that it was his right to prove a partial failure of consideration and offered to do it. Held, by the Court, *583that the giving up by the plaintiff of the note he hold against Kirby, was a sufficient consideration, even though it were of an amount less than the $1400, and the evidence was rejected.

Peters, for the plaintiff. Blake, for the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Goddard v. Hill
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jul 1, 1851
Citation: 33 Me. 582
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.